Are Big Dogs Smarter Than Small Dogs?

Size matters. Human beings are larger than more than 90% of the other species living on our planet, and evolutionary anthropologists have argued that our relatively large size has given us a survival advantage. Obviously, our increased size brings with it increased strength, it also means larger organs including everything associated with the nervous system so is it possible that larger size also brings with it increased mental ability? And if so would this fact have implications for relative intelligence in a species like dogs, where breeds may vary in size from a 4 pound (1.8 kg) Yorkshire Terrier to a 280 pound (127 kg) English Mastiff?

Stupidmommy – Creative Commons LicenseSource: Stupidmommy – Creative Commons License

Such questions popped into my head when I was analyzing the data which ultimately formed the basis for my book "The Intelligence of Dogs" in which I ranked the working and obedience intelligence of 120 different dog breeds. I remember taking a break from my statistical work to have coffee with a few my colleagues. I sat down and mused aloud about the fact that I was puzzled to find that in the top 20% of the dogs ranked for their intelligence there was only one small toy breed (the Papillon which is a roughly 8 pound [3.6 kg] toy spaniel).

Keep the tube in the family room. Research has repeatedly shown that children with a TV in their bedroom weigh more, sleep less, and have lower grades and poorer social skills. P.S. Parents with a television in their bedroom have sex less often.

One of my colleagues, a biopsychologist, smiled and said "That's a reasonable finding. Think of it this way, the larger an animal is the bigger its brain will be. A bigger brain has more neurons and more connections which should allow it to process information and store memories better. Now some researchers have suggested that as an animal increases in size it needs a bigger brain simply because it has more things that it needs to control — for example it has more muscle cells that need to be coordinated and more skin surface where each millimeter of skin contains various touch receptors whose information needs to be processed and that sort of thing. So there are some analysis schemes which involve comparing the size of the brain to the size of the body as one way of measuring intelligence. However as a first guess it makes sense to assume that an animal with a bigger brain is just going to be more cognitively efficient. The trick is that a bigger brain comes along as a simple byproduct of having a bigger body. So if somebody had told me that some ranking of the intelligence of dog breeds had come up with the fact that smaller dogs were smarter than large dogs my inclination would be to tell them to go back and recheck their data."

A recent report in the scientific journal Animal Cognition suggests that my colleague's "first guess" may be true when it comes to dogs. The research team was headed by Daniel Horschler of the School of Anthropology at the University of Arizona in Tucson. This study is interesting for a number of reasons, such as the fact that it is an example of "citizen science" which is also sometimes referred to as "community science", "crowd-sourced science" or "networked science". Citizen science is usually defined as data collection which is undertaken by members of the general public rather than trained scientists, and usually this data collection is done in collaboration with, or under the direction of, professional scientists and scientific institutions. Although such data acquisition is not as controlled and precise as it would be in the laboratory, this method does allow researchers to gather thousands of data entries economically.

The data for this report on the mental abilities of dogs were collected through a website, Dognition.com, that provides dog owners with instructions for completing cognitive experiments with pet dogs in their own homes. In this study there were 10 possible tests to be given to pet dogs. Some of these had multiple conditions and had to be repeated a number of times. The researchers claim that what they are trying to measure is something that they call the components of "executive function" which they describe as "a suite of cognitive abilities involved in behavioral control, including working memory and inhibition".

Talk about what it means to be a good person. Start early: When you read bedtime stories, for example, ask your toddler whether characters are being mean or nice and explore why.

Obviously with such a large number of different tests and measures the data analysis is going to be complicated and we don't have space here to go into all of their results. Also many of the tests are only marginally related to what most researchers tend to view as aspects of intelligence (such as whether a dog imitates the owner when he yawns, or looks at the owner's face when he holds up a treat near his eye). However one measure that they obtained is definitely a component of mental ability that is often tested by researchers interested in canine intelligence, and that is "delayed memory". In this case the memory test consists of having the owner place a treat under one of two cups in full view of the dog. Next the owner waits for 60, 90, 120 or 150 seconds before releasing the dog. This is done for four trials and the data consists of whether or not the dog goes to the correct (baited) cup.

Data were obtained from 1,888 dogs and the results were unambiguous. There was a clear trend indicating that larger dogs were able to accurately remember over a longer period of time than were their smaller counterparts. Now one important thing here is that we have been using body size as our measure, with the presumption that body size is a reasonable indicator of brain size. It is, but the researchers noticed that they could tweak their measures to get a better indication of brain size by incorporating the size and shape of the skull for the various dog breeds. When they did so the data confirmed that larger brain sizes in dogs are associated with better cognitive performance.

"We spend the first 12 months of our children’s lives teaching them to walk and talk, and the next 12 years telling them to sit down and shut up."- Phyllis Diller

An interesting result is that as we make the task harder, by increasing the memory delay, the superiority of the larger dogs becomes even more pronounced. As the researchers note "the gap in performance between breeds of varying brain sizes generally widens as a function of increased cognitive demands".

These researchers were quite careful in their statistical analysis and they tried to analyze the influence of a lot of variables on the mental performance of the dogs in their study. However we can summarize their results by noting that in every one of their analyses of the data, and for each of those tests of cognitive ability or "executive function" which turned out to be statistically significant, the results were the same. Larger dogs (larger brains) resulted in better cognitive and mental performance. To my mind, at least, this does help to explain why in my rankings of canine intelligence only one toy breed was found in the top 20%.